Making ends meet: challenges for the 2010 Strategic Defence and Security Review for the United Kingdom

David Kirkpatrick
September 2010

In recent years, a worrying gap has emerged between the military ambitions of the UK armed forces, and the financial resources allocated to them. The gap is likely to widen further in the coming years as the coalition government starts to cut public spending to eliminate the government budget deficit.

This is the context for the 2010 Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR), charged with making recommendations about the UK's future role in world affairs and about the financial resources which that role would require. In practice the SDSR must try to reduce the defence budget without incurring an unacceptable increase in the risks to national security.

In 'Making ends meet', Professor David Kirkpatrick explains the many particular problems of defence management, and emphasises that the SDSR's recommendations for UK defence policy, military capabilities and defence expenditure must be completely coherent and consistent (unlike those in the 1998 review). He suggests how the UK defence budget might be reduced by 10 per cent, in addition to savings from internal reforms and reorganisation, without the irreversible loss of any of the UK's present military and industrial capabilities.

Download the full report.

Dealing with debt: lessons from abroad

Dealing with debt coverEdited by John Springford
June 2010

The UK’s new coalition government is performing the first incisions in some drastic surgery to the state. The fiscal consolidation, which will take several years, will require a delicate - and highly political - balancing of competing interests, as it entails a transfer of wealth from taxpayers, government workers, welfare recipients, to debt markets, but in a way that prevents any party from walking out on the deal.
Other countries have been here before. 'Dealing with debt: lessons from abroad' brings together four authors, from Canada, Ireland, Sweden, and Australia, to discuss how their governments cut and reshaped the state in recent years, and what social and economic costs and benefits ensued.

 

This publication includes chapters by:
  • David Herle, political advisor to finance minister and prime minister Paul Martin, on the politics of the Canadian cuts of the 1990s
  • Pär Nuder, former Swedish finance minister, on a social democratic consolidation
  • Colm McCarthy, chair of Ireland’s 2009 expenditure review, on dealing with two Irish fiscal crises
  • Chris Aulich, specialist on John Howard’s privatisations and public services reforms, which reshaped the Australian state.
  • Download the full report
    Press Coverage:
    The Guardian: Comment is Free, 'The four ways we can cut spending', John Springford, 22 June 2010
    The Observer, 'There is no logic to the brutish cut George Osborne is proposing', Will Hutton, 20 June 2010
    Financial Times, 'Prairie wisdom from Britain's age of austerity', David Herle and John Springford,10 June 2010

    A Lib Con Trick?

    a_lib_con_trick_200.jpg
    Julian Astle
    March 2010

    The Conservatives have been talking up their chances of doing a deal with the Liberal Democrats if the general election fails to deliver them a majority. Conservative shadow business secretary Ken Clarke has even suggested that “Nick Clegg is a conservative”. David Cameron meanwhile regularly describes himself as a 'liberal' and has claimed that on a range of policy issues, “there’s barely a cigarette paper between us”.

    But according to a new report from CentreForum, the liberal think tank, the two parties’ similarities are being wildly overstated, as are the chances of them working together in a formal coalition if the Tories are returned as the largest party in a hung parliament.

    The paper, entitled 'A Lib Con trick?', points out that although the election of a self-styled ‘liberal Conservative’ as Tory leader should have increased the likelihood of meaningful co-operation between the two parties, so far, that co-operation has been conspicuous by its absence. In part, this is down to a deep rooted mutual mistrust – policy positions may be ever changing, but the culture of a party, and the core instincts of its members, are not. In part, it is a simple result of electoral imperatives – as long as the success of each party depends on the failure of the other, co-operation will prove difficult.

    Read more...

    Credit where it's due: making QE work for the real economy


    credit-where-its-due-200.jpg

    Giles Wilkes
    March 2010

    ‘Quantitative easing’ was meant to boost private spending by pumping billions of pounds into the economy. But CentreForum argues that it has done little for ordinary people and businesses. Without serious reform, it will prove powerless in the face of a second dip into recession.

    In early 2009, with interest rates at 0.5 per cent and the deficit hitting record levels, ‘QE’ was the only policy left for fighting the recession. By trying to increase the money supply directly, the Bank of England aimed to increase bank lending, lift up asset prices and restore confidence. In many ways it worked. Banks that were almost insolvent are now recording large profits, the equity market has soared, and house prices have reversed a frightening decline. It has clearly helped the government to issue a huge amount of debt relatively cheaply.

    But while the policy may have prevented financial collapse, it has done little to make life easier for small companies and households. Now, with the real possibility of a second dip into recession, CentreForum argue that QE needs urgently to be redirected towards the thousands of firms up and down the country for whom the ‘credit crunch’ is an ongoing problem.

    Read more...

    Lost Labours: where now for the liberal Left?

    Lost Labours, John KampfnerJohn Kampner
    March 2010

    In 'Lost labours: where now for the liberal Left?', John Kampfner, journalist, political campaigner and former editor of the New Statesman asks how, after more than a dozen years in office, Labour has done so little to produce a more liberal and egalitarian Britain. Although the hopes vested in Tony Blair were dashed early on, mainly due to the Iraq war, he argues that Gordon Brown could have breathed new life into the project. He concludes that that project has now foundered thanks to a combination of authoritarianism and a lack of political courage.

    John Kampfner has long described himself as a 'Left-liberal'. He argues that the causes he believes in - the quest for greater equality, an enlightened criminal justice policy, environmental protection, civil liberties, an ethical foreign policy and a more pluralist approach to politics - may now have found a stronger home within the Liberal Democrats.

    In 'Lost Labours' he explains why.

    Download the full report

    Media coverage:

    Guardian: Comment is Free: 'Our Clegg-backing letter is one for the grandchildren'

     

     

    Corporate partners

    BP BAE Systems Brunswick Citigroup City of London
      Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales  kpmg-80.gif National Grid Prospects Prudential Serco